Mercado de monitoreo de la salud estructural en América del Norte: tendencias de la industria y pronóstico hasta 2030

North America Structural Health Monitoring Market Analysis and Insights

Manufacturers are continuously trying to find ways to increase the precision of work, enhance services, and safety, and work with growing technology. The requirement for these reasons is being fulfilled by implementing structural health monitoring as they are used to provide enhanced, uninterrupted, free, and timely services at the end user applications. Structural health monitoring in the infrastructure industry is being used widely for structural health monitoring solutions and the rising adoption of digital technologies in the industrial sector. Structural health monitoring helps operators make better decisions around supply chain, machinery, assets performance, drilling, and others. The North America structural health monitoring market is expected to grow due to growing digitization in the construction industry.

Data Bridge Market Research analyzes that the North America structural health monitoring market is expected to reach the value of USD 3,409.52 thousand by 2030, at a CAGR of 18.0% during the forecast period.

North America Structural Health Monitoring Market Definition

Structural health monitoring (SHM) monitors changes in the material and geometric qualities of engineering structures, such as bridges and buildings, over time using periodically sampled response measurements. The output of this process is periodically updated information regarding the ability of the structure to perform its intended function in light of the inevitable aging and degradation resulting from operational environments for long-term structural health monitoring. After extreme events, such as earthquakes or blast loading, structural health monitoring is used for rapid condition screening and aims to provide, in near real-time, reliable information regarding the integrity of the structure.

Structural health monitoring offers the following numerous benefits to the customers: forecast and measures profits, Integrate and augment systems, track and measure construction activities, manage risk portfolio, boost revenue and enhance productivity, enable remote operations, reduce manual interactions, automate decisions, and others. Structural health monitoring simplifies communications between the system and the operators. It is helping the laborers to enhance their productivity and to optimize cost and operations.

North America Structural Health Monitoring Market Dynamics

This section deals with understanding the market drivers, advantages, opportunities, restraints, and challenges. All of this is discussed in detail below:    

Drivers

• GROWING INFRASTRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT ACROSS THE GLOBE 

Structural health monitoring (SHM) is a range of systems implemented on full-scale civil infrastructures to assist and inform operators about the continued 'fitness for purpose' of structures under gradual or sudden changes to their state and to learn about either or both of the load and response mechanisms.

Infrastructure plays a critical role in economic and social development across the globe. It has huge importance in both developed and developing economies. The impact of seismic transformation in the economy has changed citizens' perspectives.

The importance of infrastructure is widely recognized and well-researched. However, there have been relatively few attempts to track and monitor infrastructure investment across countries where studies have assessed North America infrastructure needs; the adoption of myriad definitions and approaches has consistently made monitoring trends difficult. The various initiatives and developments in infrastructure across the globe are expected to drive the growth of the North America structural health monitoring market.

Restraint

• HIGH INSTALLATION AND MONITORING COSTS

The need and requirement for structural health monitoring systems have increased due to rapid digitalization and improved industrialization. Most complicated civil structures need structural health monitoring systems. But small structures cannot manage the structural health monitoring systems' installation cost and maintenance charges. As the need increases, the raw materials cost for structural health monitoring systems gradually increases.

Both capital expenditure (CAPEX) and operational expenditure (OPEX) are essential for structural health monitoring systems. The initial procurement of structural health monitoring systems, huge cabinets, and monitoring software is included in CAPEX. Structural health monitoring systems cost more than others because they require huge cabinets containing modules that allow growth. As a result, organizations must plan for their desired capacity to reap the full benefits of structural health monitoring systems. Structural health monitoring units require ongoing, high-cost maintenance after installation. High-complexity structures necessitate high-efficiency instrumentation, which raises total costs. Furthermore, the expenditures of monitoring are quite significant. Also, structural health monitoring systems involve costing issues in the maintenance and upgradation of the system, which is projected to restrain the market.

Opportunity

INTEGRATION OF TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED SOLUTIONS FOR STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING

Business process automation uses technology to execute recurring tasks or processes in a business where manual effort can be replaced. It is done to minimize costs, increase efficiency, and streamline processes. Digital transformation has been a top priority for companies in recent years, but now many businesses are taking a closer look at the actively evolving concept of digitalization.

Structural health monitoring implements a damage detection strategy for aerospace, civil and mechanical engineering infrastructure. Advances in sensors and information technologies have brought structural health monitoring (SHM) a data-driven remedy for civil infrastructure safety. Typical damage experienced by this infrastructure might be the development of fatigue cracks, degradation of structural connections, or bearing wear in rotating machinery. This application's structural health monitoring solution will integrate structural dynamics, wireless data acquisition, local actuation, micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) technology, and statistical pattern recognition algorithms.

In a sense, the new integrated technologies involve the usage of ultrasonic, dye penetration, and fibroscopy, among others. The involvement of these integrated technologies does not cause any defect or damage to the critical structures because it is difficult to monitor the entire health of a structure using only one technique; the integration approach is the greatest instrument for structural health monitoring. As a result, many key players are focusing on developing cost-effective structural health monitoring solutions that incorporate electrical, magnetic, thermal, and other physical variables, chemical variables, and a variety of technologies to provide more accurate results, which is likely to boost the adoption of integrated structural health monitoring systems.

Challenge

LACK OF STANDARDIZATION IN MANAGING LARGE VOLUMES OF DATA

The lack of standardized terminology for categorizing and describing various interventions in the field of structural health monitoring involves structural factors, environmental factors, and others that are causing problems for the health of critical structures. The structural health monitoring solution installed places is classified depending upon the criticality of the civil structures and the location of the structures. Different structural health monitoring solutions, such as the sensor system, the data acquisition, and transmission system, the data management system, the condition evaluation system, and others, are used for different intense critical structures in dams, bridges, and other manufacturing industries. Therefore, standardization acts as the major factor that acts as a major challenge for the market.

The intensity of the critical civil structure determines the appropriate structural health monitoring solution to be used with standard harmonization. However, there are some differences in the product design, testing, and installation requirements between the business and the government system due to the difference in the classification of zones by manufacturers and regulatory bodies. The above factors led to the lack of standardization, which is challenging for the market.

Recent Developments

• In May 2021, Sisgeo S.r.l. introduced the MD-Profile gauges. The system is suitable for geotechnical and structural applications, for which vertical or horizontal accurate profiling is needed, to improve the product portfolio of the company.
• In November 2020, HBK updated or technically refined its compressive force transducer C10 to make it more cost-efficient due to increased precision. This helped the product as an ideal solution for demanding test branches, laboratory, and production applications.

North America Structural Health Monitoring Market Scope

El mercado de monitoreo de la salud estructural de América del Norte está segmentado en seis segmentos notables, como tipo, conectividad, instalación, método, aplicación y usuario final. El crecimiento entre segmentos lo ayuda a analizar nichos de crecimiento y estrategias para abordar el mercado y determinar sus áreas de aplicación principales y la diferencia en sus mercados objetivo. 

MERCADO DE VIGILANCIA DE LA SALUD ESTRUCTURAL EN AMÉRICA DEL NORTE, POR TIPO

• Hardware
• Software
• Servicios

Según el tipo, el mercado de monitoreo de salud estructural de América del Norte está segmentado en hardware, software y servicios.

MERCADO DE MONITOREO ESTRUCTURAL DE LA SALUD EN AMÉRICA DEL NORTE, POR CONECTIVIDAD

• Cableado
• Inalámbrico

Sobre la base de la conectividad, el mercado de monitoreo de la salud estructural de América del Norte está segmentado en cableado e inalámbrico.

MERCADO DE MONITOREO DE SALUD ESTRUCTURAL EN AMÉRICA DEL NORTE, POR TIPO DE INSTALACIÓN

• Nueva instalación
• Modernización

Sobre la base de la instalación, el mercado de monitoreo de la salud estructural de América del Norte se segmenta en nuevas instalaciones y renovaciones.

MERCADO DE VIGILANCIA DE LA SALUD ESTRUCTURAL EN AMÉRICA DEL NORTE, POR MÉTODO

• Inspección visual
• Evaluación no destructiva (END)

Sobre la base del método, el mercado de monitoreo de la salud estructural de América del Norte está segmentado en inspección visual y evaluación no destructiva.

MERCADO DE MONITOREO DE LA SALUD ESTRUCTURAL EN AMÉRICA DEL NORTE, POR APLICACIÓN

• Detección de daños
• Detección de grietas
• Monitoreo de la tensión
• Monitoreo de rotura de cables
• Detección de fugas
• Detección multimodal
• Monitoreo de la corrosión
• Monitoreo de puntos de acceso
• Monitoreo de impacto
• Monitoreo de deflexión

Sobre la base de la aplicación, el mercado de monitoreo de la salud estructural de América del Norte está segmentado en detección de daños, detección de grietas, monitoreo de deformación, monitoreo de rotura de cables, detección de fugas, detección multimodal, monitoreo de corrosión, monitoreo de puntos calientes, monitoreo de impacto y monitoreo de deflexión.

MERCADO DE MONITOREO DE LA SALUD ESTRUCTURAL EN AMÉRICA DEL NORTE, POR USUARIO FINAL

• Civil
• Aeroespacial
• Energía
• Minería
• Marina
• Industrial
• Plataforma offshore
• Defensa
• Escuelas
• Parques públicos y recreación
• Automotor
• Otros

Sobre la base del usuario final, el mercado de monitoreo de la salud estructural de América del Norte está segmentado en civil, aeroespacial, energía, minería, marino, industrial, plataformas offshore, defensa, escuela, parques públicos y recreación, automotriz y otros.

Análisis y perspectivas regionales del mercado de monitoreo de la salud estructural en América del Norte

El mercado de monitoreo de la salud estructural de América del Norte se clasifica en seis segmentos notables: tipo, conectividad, tipo de instalación, método, aplicación y usuario final.

Los países cubiertos en este informe de mercado son Estados Unidos, Canadá y México.

Se espera que Estados Unidos crezca debido al aumento del avance tecnológico en el mercado de monitoreo de la salud estructural.

La sección de países del informe también proporciona factores de impacto individuales en el mercado y cambios en la regulación en el mercado a nivel nacional que afectan las tendencias actuales y futuras del mercado. Los puntos de datos como nuevas ventas, ventas de reemplazo, demografía del país, leyes regulatorias y aranceles de importación y exportación son algunos de los principales indicadores utilizados para pronosticar el escenario del mercado para países individuales. Además, se consideran la presencia y disponibilidad de marcas de América del Norte y los desafíos que enfrentan debido a la competencia grande o escasa de las marcas locales y nacionales, y el impacto de los canales de venta al proporcionar un análisis de pronóstico de los datos del país.

Análisis del panorama competitivo y de la cuota de mercado de los sistemas de monitoreo de la salud estructural en América del Norte

El panorama competitivo del mercado de monitoreo de la salud estructural de América del Norte proporciona detalles por competidor. Los detalles incluidos son una descripción general de la empresa, las finanzas de la empresa, los ingresos generados, el potencial de mercado, la inversión en I+D, las nuevas iniciativas de mercado, los sitios e instalaciones de producción, las fortalezas y debilidades de la empresa, el lanzamiento de productos, las aprobaciones de productos, la amplitud y amplitud de los productos, el dominio de la aplicación, la curva de vida del tipo de producto. Los puntos de datos anteriores proporcionados solo están relacionados con el enfoque de la empresa en el mercado de monitoreo de la salud estructural de América del Norte.

Algunos de los principales actores que operan en el mercado de monitoreo de salud estructural son GEOKON, Campbell Scientific, Inc., SIXENSE Systems, Kinemetrics, Digitexx Data Systems, Inc., NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS CORP., OSMOS Group SA, HBK, Nova Ventures, Acellent Technologies Inc., James Fisher and Sons plc., SODIS Lab, GoeSIG Ltd, STRUCTURAL MONITORING SYSTEMS PLC., FEAC Engineering, Xylem Inc., Sisgeo Srl, FIRST SENSOR AG, Digitex, Geomotion Singapore y COWI A/S, entre otros.

SKU-66610